Thread: Truck support in NG versions

O4i - great thanks for the answer - as usual concise and content - thanks.

But I have the impression that we are talking about two different things!
The author of the question - Mate Ludo (thx for a question) - pointed out the essence of the issue - choosing a route that would have no limits (as I understood it), and not signaling the limitation.
You - you think the problem is the lack of signaling online restrictions (so I understand your answer)
On the other hand - apart from the fact that such signaling is and is very good - I believe this is the least problem!

I will explain my position - using a medical comparison:

You say - there are no symptoms, so there is nothing to cure
I say - why treat - better prevent!

And exactly - better in my opinion choose the route without limitation than meet the restrictions - even signaled - on this route!
Why? - it's simple - there are limits that can (in some cases) prevent further driving.
For example, when driving a vehicle with a height of 4.4 m - on the motorway - we have a tunnel or bridge in front of you with a height of 4.0 m, the previous exit of the motorway was 15 km earlier, next to the tunnel (bridge) that signaled restricted ???

Next case:
"The speedcam subsystem has nothing to do with truck restrictions." - Unfortunately, but with such a statement I find it hard to agree!
"speedcam subsystem" is a team that allows you to show events, constraints or places on the map - important for the driver - eg radar, speedometer, school zone, etc. -
Some of the information that this system uses is contained in the fda (file driver alerts) file.
If:
[Speedcam_category 6]
= activated_spoken_type speech
activated_speech = "Caution dangerous railway crossing"
or
[Speedcam_category 16]
= activated_spoken_type speech
activated_speech = "give way"
or
[Speedcam_category 20]
= activated_spoken_type speech
activated_speech = "Dangerous Turn"
or etc ..
There are no driver alerts - I personally do not understand anything anymore ....!

And finally a small supplement - as I wrote in the beginning - visualization of restriction while driving (in my version) - today, driving real mode, truck profile Ludo:

Route through Scinawa to Wroclaw
without restriction - fast, length - 196 km

Spoiler: .

Short stay without restriction - 241 km.

Spoiler: ..

Short - with restriction - 174 km.

Spoiler: ...

After entering the Bridge and Tunnel points, Restriction appears in the route plan

Spoiler: ....

There was a warning on the bridge

Spoiler: .....

And at the entrance to the tunnel / overpass warning

Spoiler: ......

After avoiding Restriction further route is such (89 km)

Spoiler: .......

Conclusion - It is obvious that the short with restriction is shorter than the fast route of 152 km!
But:
If the ride was a Mate Ludo vehicle - the first restriction I could break - but the other unfortunately unfortunately no longer has a carriageway 12 m wide, so I could not turn back.
So you see that even with the online restriction signaling while driving - without the possibility of choosing a route without restriction, they can be big problems.

regards wojpen

PS.
For me (User - Driver) is absolutely everything - what is inside, what version and whether original or mix version.
It is important that the program performs the functions that I need and expect. The rest is invalid