Thread: iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)

As this is merely a discussion on neutral ground, I will go on and give a completely objective response, free from any AI influence.

It should be noted that this standard was not created overnight and has been refined over time in response to various demands. At one point in its history, this is what it represented.

Spoiler: EUR+

Code:

Please Login or Register to see the links

It is related to an older and more limited use that was already present in the skins for iGO8.

Spoiler: iGO Base Choup

Code:

Please Login or Register to see the links

There was reportedly even a variant for the Arimi skin, though nothing is certain.
This variant of the standard in use at NNG did not originate exclusively from the LOLO site, but from a community of passionate individuals, which also included members from the Mioskins site. At that time, all the working groups active on their respective forums and providing foundational data for France, in accordance with their radar models, were in contact and exchanged information on the evolution of the final EUR+ standard, exclusively applicable to France. This particularity is not unique to the French context, as Spain and Italy also had their own variants of the NNG standard. It should be noted that other so-called Eastern or Asian countries likely have their own variants, but language differences make it impossible to compare what existed or is still in use.

It can be stated that the EUR+ standard is not dead, but is primarily used by locals and holds little interest for those who do not travel to these countries with different needs. Therefore, if its maintenance on GpsPower is no longer considered necessary, this does not pose a problem, as there will always be French sites that continue to use it with the appropriate databases.

The key point to remember is that it is not possible to unify all these variants into a single global standard, which would have been convenient for your interests. And it is not by targeting others on different sites, highlighting by name the weaknesses in their contributions, that your reputation will be enhanced in your attempt to become the sole legitimate and reliable provider. Moreover, your revised, improved, and verified French database includes an element that is outside the territorial zone (the one you noted as present on another site).

To conclude, I would like to mention a saying that goes:
“Why do you see the speck that is in your brother’s eye, and do not notice the beam that is in your own eye?”
The moral of this story is that one should avoid pointing out the small faults of others while not correcting one’s own shortcomings.

But I would be much more accommodating to align with the element beyond the territorial boundary.
"Pointing out the beam in another’s eye should not serve to make one forget the speck in one’s own."