I very much like to use Primo since 10 years ago and still happy using.
Recently, I acquired a used China made Leshp 6.0" android navigator with system 4.4.2 for US$7.50. The previous owner only use Google Map which require the internet.
It started my study to put iGO Nextgen into this old android set.
I read this forum for many days to find the solution which I finally did; (iGO World 9.18.27.736653 (19.06.2018) on SD.) appreciate all the inputs here. Thank you very much.
The specifications of this set:
Manufacturer : alps
Model: m515
Firmware: 4.4.2; eng.shansp.1440147337; SDK19
CPU 4 cores; ARMv7 Processor rev 3 (v7l); Max: 1300.0 MHz; Min: 747.5 MHz
Display 800 x 480; DPI: 160; Evaluated Size: 5.8"
Touch screen Multitouch 5 points
GPU Mali-450 MP; ARM; OpenGL ES-CM 1.1; OpenGL ES 2.0
RAM: 512 MB (500 MB available)
Flash: 0.375 GB; 8 GB (7.279 GB actual) (see memory map tab) "a limitation of system 4.4.2"
Phone: None
WiFi IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n; MediaTek 8127; AP Mode
USB Host: Yes
Bluetooth: Bluetooth 4.0+HS
GPS: Yes
-
Besides the license problem , what is the disadvantage of Nextgen compared to Primo 2.4 in a portable Win CE 6.0 China made 7" GPS?
I also noted that more users opt for Primo instead of Nextgen previously, what is the situation currently?
For me, comparing the two sets, android need to be put to "sleep" mode in order to start up again to where I have switched off the car engine otherwise it would need to go through startup of the android system again before the iGO app.
On top of that the screen at max is still darker than the Win CE 6.0 GPS. Calculation of route is slightly faster with Nextgen though.



Likes: 

Reply With Quote

Bookmarks