Thread: CityXplorer maps unlocked to work in Nuvis 37xx series

miodrags

Today I put all the files as you said and nuvi 3790 sees all of them. I do not use .unl files but rather unlock the maps with Fast IMG Unlocker 1.4
Now on 16 GB sd micro I have more than 34 maps...

Thanks..

Originally Posted by warblade52

miodrags

Today I put all the files as you said and nuvi 3790 sees all of them. I do not use .unl files but rather unlock the maps with Fast IMG Unlocker 1.4
Now on 16 GB sd micro I have more than 34 maps...

Hi,
How do you manage to use them all at the same time? Do you rename the IMG files to gmapsupp.img when necessary? Or have you joined them all into a single IMG file?

Second, could somebody please explain me once again: is there any use of having say CityXplorer Helsinki, or CityXplorer Oslo when I already have City Navigator Europe? (Caty, I've seen your post, thank you; however, I still do have some questions left but can't post them to where I started them because you've closed the topic; Please tell me if I am doing something wrong and this is against the rules to ask questions like that.)

The reason I am asking is because I've had different experience in routing for pedestrian roaming when using City Navigator Russia and CityXplorer Saint-Petersburg. When using City Navigator NT Russia in Garmin Mobile XT with pedestrian mode enabled I've had routing in Saint-Petersburg completely different to what I had with CityXplorer Saint-Petersburg. The Garmin Mobile XT was providing improper routing on CN Russia resulting in routes that were far away from reality. It seemed like the map simply hasn't had any information about 'pedestrian' object for many of the streets. I switched to CityXplorer and... voila! it resulted in proper short routes that were exactly what I needed. Imagine, some routes have shortened by 100%! Is it because something went wrong with CN Russia and in fact the maps are just identical (providing that I could cut the Saint-Petersburg's map from CN Russia instead of installing the CityXplorer)?

Also, is it correct that CityXplorer provides navigation information that suggests which public transport can be used to get to destination in the city whereas the City Navigator's maps do not provide this info? Say, I've heard that CityXplorer suggests the route where it includes buses, metro and other transport I could take to reach the destination address whereas the City Navigator's map does not provide this info.

Thank you.