No need to be that way. I do know what I'm saying and it's not just opinion, it's science and mathematics. You can remain stubborn or look again at my previous posts, personally I don't give a **** either but I do care about not creating even more confusion for readers of this forum. Every thing I've said is fact and backed up with evidence. That's shaken your opinion and anecdotal experience but that's no justification to simply attack me contrary to the facts. Read on if you want, or not, jinxxxxxx, either way I don't care. But the last thing I want to do is allow the confusion over binary and decimal forms of 'kilo' to fester. There is no justification for this statement:
Noway will a 2,040,000,000 bytes file fit on a 2gb card.
Clearly it will fit because an even larger img file fits on my '2gb' card. Maybe less words and more pictures will help with understanding:

2 GB CF 1

2 GB CF 2
Source of above:
Code:
Please Login or Register to see the links
About this statement:
If you wish to limit yourself to 1.87 gb file size be my quest.
Certainly you may have a CF card limited to '1.87gb', by which I guess you mean 1.87 gibibytes and that's only around 2,008,000,000 bytes so a file of 2,040,000 B won't fit. Certainly capacities of cards vary depending on the manufacturer. I've got SD and microSD '2GB' cards which vary between 1.84 and 1.87 GiB effective capacity. The indisputable point is that my Sandisk 2GB CF's have ~1.90 GiB.

If you wish to continue a discussion factually with dignity and politeness jinxxxxxx then please respond if you'd like more info or clarification. Otherwise I'll not contribute further to this.