Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.
Page 35 of 38 FirstFirst ... 253334353637 ... LastLast
Results 341 to 350 of 377

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member + iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Espańa
    Age
    59
    Posts
    64
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Friend, you responded while I was editing my post. (What a response speed!) And taking advantage of this new post, when the section doesn't close and the old Igo Primo gets stuck at a speed of 5km, should any entry in the sys. be modified? Although as I have told you before, in my road tests sometimes it works well and other times it keeps sounding the initial 5 km section.

    I am only referring to some modification of the file "sys.txt", so that the closure is correct.
    Last edited by pacodelgps; 3rd July 2026 at 11:14 AM.

  2.    Advertissements


  3. #2
    SUPER MODERATOR iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)
    iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)
    Andrey Form's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Location
    Belarus
    Posts
    3,925
    Rep Power
    2819

    Default

    If the speed on the screen is 5 km/h, it means that the average speed section is over. The easiest way is to tap on the screen - the navigator icon and it closes.
    PS
    iGo Primo WinCE 9.6 - these or others are on android. At the peak of their activity, these programs had no problems closing the average speed section. It worked like this, opened and closed spc files, but now they are gone. And the spc files were updated 4 times a year. Who will undertake to implement the closure of medium-speed sections in the old programs. New programs 64 bit now.
    Last edited by Andrey Form; 3rd July 2026 at 12:02 PM.
    gps5

    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]


    ©AF_2020-26

  4. #3
    Member + iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Espańa
    Age
    59
    Posts
    64
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Good morning community, I have several types of radars near my area. There is a fixed one of 80 km/h that the Igo Primo NexGen notifies without any problem, but in WinCE it shows the correct speed on the screen, yet it alerts "fixed radar 100 km/h." It's curious because 5 km from that location there is another 80 km/h one that it notifies without any problem on any device. I use the bases from "laradiobbs" encoded in iTruk by my friend AF.
    It's just out of curiosity, it's not important. The coordinates are:
    -1.159660, 37.944390

  5. #4
    SUPER MODERATOR iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)
    iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)
    Andrey Form's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Location
    Belarus
    Posts
    3,925
    Rep Power
    2819

    Default

    Hi,
    If you do not have this entry in sys:
    use_road_speedlimit=1
    For each type of notification. You will not be able to use speedcam_iTruck.txt or speedcam_Truck.txt . I wonder who should have answered this question, because it's not really addressed to me.

    Quote Originally Posted by pacodelgps View Post
    Good morning community,....

    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    Last edited by Andrey Form; 10th July 2026 at 06:19 PM.
    gps5

    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]


    ©AF_2020-26

  6. #5
    Member + iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Espańa
    Age
    59
    Posts
    64
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    You are right AF, I don't have that entry in sys.txt, I have added it and will try it.
    I didn't know anything about that entry, I was unaware of its usefulness.

    Edit:

    Everything is correct on Android and simulation with Lockito. I haven't deleted the 'save' folder and it has worked. Tonight I will try it with Wince and comment.

    The problem in Wince has been solved, now it notifies perfectly.
    Last edited by pacodelgps; 15th July 2026 at 03:47 PM.

  7. #6
    SUPER MODERATOR iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)
    iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)
    Andrey Form's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Location
    Belarus
    Posts
    3,925
    Rep Power
    2819

    Default

    Сoding and truck application

    Lately, POI and KML files have practically replaced certain speedcam alerts, such as height limits, width limits, weight control, and other specific alerts needed only for trucks. This makes it possible to apply iTruck in VB coding—just like in the default pongo skin across all versions. I plan to release another version, VB iTruck, which will differ from NC iTruck as it won't include Weight Control and Dimension Limits. VB iTruck will alert about rear-facing radars. I think this is the right decision and code unification; this way, one standard code can be used for all vehicle types, both trucks and passenger cars.
    gps5

    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]


    ©AF_2020-26

  8. #7
    Important User iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)
    iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)
    costas3850's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    ro
    Age
    38
    Posts
    501
    Rep Power
    947

    Default

    Hello.
    I'm trying to position two radars very close together :
    X,Y,TYPE,SPEED,DIRTYPE,DIRECTION
    25.906520,43.756520,4,90,1,168
    25.906590,43.756470,4,5,1,348

    iGO Primo and iGO Luna see both locations, but iGO_NextGen_9.18.27.687519 ignores one of the locations.
    If I increase the distance between the two locations (about 40 m) it's fine.
    Am I doing something wrong?
    Any advice is appreciated.

    Spoiler: images


    i GO Primo i GO Luna

    i GO Next Gen Israel

    Last edited by costas3850; 30th July 2026 at 11:50 AM.

  9. #8
    SUPER MODERATOR iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)
    iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)
    Andrey Form's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Location
    Belarus
    Posts
    3,925
    Rep Power
    2819

    Default

    What you see on the screen does not matter. What is written in the speedcam.txt file is what actually counts. Also, deleting two points makes no difference for the alerts; you can just as easily create identical coordinates with different azimuths, for example:

    25.906520, 43.756520, 4,90,1,168,
    25.906520, 43.756520, 4,5,1,348
    OSC separates these coordinates to make it easy to edit points on the map.
    gps5

    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]


    ©AF_2020-26

  10. #9
    Member + iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Espańa
    Age
    59
    Posts
    64
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    After the closure of BBS, the only thing that drivers in Spain are interested in is the position of seatbelt and mobile cameras (also fixed speed cameras). I have noticed that OSC also has it under the name 'Dummy'. In that category, will only those cameras be included or also others? In the tests I have done with route simulation on Android with Lockito, it works perfectly.


    I meant: I wanted to say 'camera for phone control and seat belt use'
    Last edited by pacodelgps; 30th July 2026 at 01:21 PM.

  11. #10
    SUPER MODERATOR iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)
    iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)
    Andrey Form's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Location
    Belarus
    Posts
    3,925
    Rep Power
    2819

    Default

    'camera for phone control and seat belt use' - Yes, that's it. And in other countries, this type of 30, for example, in Italy, corresponds to a surveillance camera.
    OSC - Spain, we didn't add many types of alerts to the database, as it didn't make sense. For those traveling from France to Spain, there are enough notification types in the OSC database to avoid receiving a fine.
    gps5

    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]


    ©AF_2020-26

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •