Likes: 
@BIRBANTE
Hi,
The fact is that I do not modify the POI base, I only publish data from it. So you see what the base does, of course it is better to have one point and 2 directions than 2 points and 2 directions, there is no need to carry out tests, the only question is the number of lines in the speedcam.txt file, this does not affect anything else.
Code:Please Login or Register to see the links
Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.
Results 1 to 10 of 272
Thread: iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)
Hybrid View
-
10th March 2024, 02:23 PM #1SUPER MODERATOR
- Join Date
- Oct 2019
- Location
- Belarus
- Posts
- 2,678
- Rep Power
- 2502
Last edited by Andrey Form; 10th March 2024 at 02:29 PM.
-
10th March 2024, 03:02 PM #2Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
- Location
- TUSCANY - ITALY
- Posts
- 353
- Rep Power
- 297
But in fact I didn't blame you for those files, I just pointed out that you publish them and "you should" know how they are made, I noticed it because I compared them with those of SCDB.
I urged you to take tests, but you won't take them and I'll tell you what happens anyway.
In the first test with "double" files, the first station encountered is regularly alerted, the following ones are ignored. On the way back the same thing happens, the first station we encounter is alerted and the subsequent ones are ignored.
In the second test using the stations with Dirtype 2 exactly what happens in the first test happens, both on the outward and return journey.
It seems that both modes are "toxic" for iGO, however, if we use the usual txt files in the speedcam folder in addition to the "toxic" one, everything magically works normally, probably diluted with many other "normal" stations they are no longer so "poisonous".
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks