Thread: iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)

For example, the assembly based on the Pongo skin, as everyone knows, with coding VB.

The assembly is intended for use with a cargo vehicle called the iGO Pongo® Truck, list of files to use:

Code:

Please Login or Register to see the links

here is the salad, SpeedCamEU Truck.txt already has all the files above the list (39, 40, 44, 38, 41, 42, 53) all the speeds for the Truck. Next is a regular file
SpeedCamText.txt Base SCDB where is the speed limit for passenger cars.

FAQ Speed ​​camera notification not working V2

There are such stories, I recently wrote how important it is
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] But this was not the limit of stupidity.

Apparently this is a new development.
in general DIRTYPE cannot be 30 (40,50,60), but only 1, 2 or 0
And of course in most cases, if (DIRECTION) = 0 then (DIRTYPE) should be = 0


X,Y,TYPE,SPEED,DIRTYPE,DIRECTION
-0.646830,51.926690,1,,30,0
-5.887360,54.520810,4,,50,0
-5.873060,54.595610,1,,30,0
-5.352670,50.208970,1,,60,0
-5.045080,50.416940,4,,30,0

Spoiler: +

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

The file was downloaded from a friendly forum

Do not use this file, you can download it as a sample, what you do not need to put in the content/speedcam folder:

This is probably important for all users to know, for all those who will use a fake file.
Moreover, not all the lines are false, but only 15%. I think this is not the case, swap places.
X,Y,TYPE,DIRECTION,SPEED,DIRTYPE
This rearrangement will make 85% of the alert lines the same incorrect, without notification.

Code:

Please Login or Register to see the links

What people expect is mutual help on radars files and explanations of how they work.

Of course, they won't use it, but there are two ways to find out about it by reading a note on the forum and the second option is to get a fine if you use a false file. The LoLo forum prefers the second option. And it's their choice, they don't control the fake files.

Just such reports, when we consider possible variants of fake files on the forum and give users the overall picture, and the main thesis, not all speedcam.txt files.You can put txt in the navigator.

Originally Posted by Andrey Form

The LoLo forum prefers the second option. And it's their choice, they don't control the fake files.

It's just that they got tired of the hype and your aggression over there. the role of msieurlolo forum isn't to decide saying who's wrong or who's right, you think that Cerrobi does not do the job well, it is your conviction but not necessarily theirs, the question is not to choose a base according to the risk of obtaining a fine with bad data, but to preserve the freedom of this choice by the diversity of offers and not only of a single depositary.

Robert is not the only publicist who makes fake files, there are other skilled people and I always warn users - beware of fakes. It is obvious that he publishes fake files more often than others, for this reason his name appears in this topic more often than others.
LOLO's philosophy is generally clear, but why do I need such a forum where I can't write about a fake file, but for some reason I have to write Thank you. This philosophy does not suit me and it is better not to visit such forums where the administration does not bear any responsibility for the published files.

"New Automatic Speed ​​Cameras Coming in 2025"

New automatic speed cameras in 2025, but cameras installed in 2024, namely in May, were added to the lufop database in January 2025.
For example: Latitude : 43.28411 Longitude : 5.49088 Azimuth : 100 23-01-2025 The radar turret was installed in May 2024.
Latitude : 45.4032 Longitude : 4.3644 Azimuth : 70 23-01-2025 The radar turret was installed in 20 May 2024.
Latitude : 44.23797 Longitude : 0.44565 Azimuth : 75 21-01-2025 The radar turret was installed in December 2023.
Latitude : 43.41726 Longitude : 6.68316 Azimuth : 155 19-01-2025 The radar turret was installed in May 2024.
Latitude : 44.83674 Longitude : -0.14578 Azimuth : 330 19-01-2025 The radar turret was installed in February 2024.
Latitude : 44.6228 Longitude : -0.06023 Azimuth : 345 19-01-2025 The radar turret was installed in March 2024.

Code:

Please Login or Register to see the links

Added points to the database 6-9 months after installation, but this is not the main thing. The problem is in azimuths, not all users responsibly added azimuths to the map, deviation from the main direction of the road is allowed maximum 19 degrees for iGO navigation.

Spoiler: ++++

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

+ This is the same place on the OSC map

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

After analysis, conclusions and recommendations.
The fact is that the procedure for adding a point to the map is not thought out and is not controlled by moderators. As a result, 500 points on the map need to be edited, this is data for France. The best option for this base would be to abandon the targeted notification and continue to maintain the base for France as it is done for other countries, circular notification. The missing information on radars installed earlier is a solvable issue, the more participants, the more reliable the information. I do not recommend using the lufop base in iGO navigators , an alternative to SCDB.

and so on

Spoiler: ++++++

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

I think this is the last review, because the distributor of the content eventually saw what he was spreading on various forums. Here are his revelations on the French forum. The key word is, "We just didn't notice it until now."

Spoiler: screenshot

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Translation into English:
"Hello, everyone who downloaded the file from 23.01.2025, you should not use it.
My program incorrectly converted negative coordinates,
I will change it. We just did not notice it until now.
We apologize for the inconvenience caused."

Of course they didn't notice, despite the fact that I wrote about it on the French forum of Mr. LOLO, on the German forum (digital-eliteboard). The problem is that a regular user cannot know and cannot verify the veracity of the information. The forum administration also does not control the files posted. Advice for everyone, use verified sources.