Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Member +
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Hawaii
    Posts
    34
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Hi,

    I made the tests below with TT maps/fsp 2017.06 and unav hsp 2017.05 in Rome/Italy using a route with start point at the Colosseum and destination in Ciampino Airport (outside city). Route "now" is Thursday about 22:30 (few online traffic), and route "scheduled" is on Friday at 18:00 (many people living out of Rome leave the city that time). Also I just put screenshot of "fast alternatives"

    1. Route "now" with all traffic disabled

    Spoiler: pic1
    15d1777039d18db9f58ac33a198befb6


    2. Route "now" with online traffic enabled

    Spoiler: pic2
    add1ea01b19c87a3f72947faf1d3a2b1


    3. Route "scheduled" with hsp only

    Spoiler: pic3
    2ba9f874121662d74c1ff05273bc7b19


    4. Route "scheduled" with fsp only

    Spoiler: pic4
    a9a3b84de114e50d28408de44bce2e16


    5. Route "scheduled" with hsp and fsp together

    Spoiler: pic5
    128358a369ead8ee159a8636bf6da483


    So even if the route is not that long, the differences are obvious, and it seems that fsp has more data (more delay is calculated), and when using both fsp and hsp the "weights" of traffic are somehow added. Quite cool...
    Last edited by Boki; 6th October 2017 at 06:19 AM.

  2.    Advertissements


 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •