Thread: FJV & FJW discussions

Thanks for verifying, I was wondering if it would stretch in landscape mode. Ok, so we have something new. The .fjv can store format similar to .fjw (definitely different from raster format) I have to investigate on how to decode that format. But why create two file extensions for storing similar format AND why .fjv always less entries than .fjw (but bigger in size)?

It would take a lot of testing to confirm but since the HERE images don't contain a lot of detail it's possible they re-use the same image for many junctions. That could partially explain the different counts.
That wouldn't work for TomTom because the images are very specific. In the example I used the buildings and even the big tree are actually there in real life.

Sent from my SM-A310Y using Tapatalk