Thread: Pin Lock lost ? Get help here if you prove your ownership

Originally Posted by ddabcd277

@ Redrock3

Here what my proposal is and I think the guys and the ladies would agree. We can help unlocking "your" device for a small fee. But this fee is going to be a donation for lets say...ill children. What do you say?

Acually, it's mene_su_banovali's boss who has the locked 660. Redrock3 was the one who 'threw petrol on the flames' of this contentious issue. However i personally think that's a great solution but then i'm not the one actually having to do the work, and just because it's beyond my limited understanding that doesn't mean it would be hard to do although i suspect it would be enormously difficult the first time it's done from scratch. We happily pay professionals for most services and products, so why not this highly skilled service?

Originally Posted by kunix

..... What do others think?

* You and Jessica wouldn't last 5 seconds.
* Who cares if Scarlett even has a brain.
* I'm practically dumb-struck that you can actually do that, and you should imo.

Originally Posted by kunix

Giomen
I want to have in my bed Alizée Jacotey, Jessica Alba, and Scarlett Johanson (in that order). Do you think american democracy must help me satisfy my wishes? Do you think I should blame Obama if these women deny me?

I think Alizée Jacotey, Jessica Alba, and Scarlett Johanson also have the right to choose!? So Obama do not put to shame of your case

I like more democratic than you. In certain states I could pretend to bed with these above characters. But I realize that the mentioned states would require too much of me. So most likely I will choose a neighbor from the top floor in our case. I even have a bottle of champagne for $10 in my case. I think you will agree that this inexpensive unlock tool is not a criminal and fit into the democratic norms. I could come without a gift and have success in any case! But! Harmless at first sight the bottle can also apply in already empty state as a big heavy bottle to our star girls but in this case they do not have any choice. Accordingly Obama and I consider this last method for removing GirlLock as undemocratic.

Originally Posted by Giomen

I think Alizée Jacotey, Jessica Alba, and Scarlett Johanson also have the right to choose!?

Oh, so you actually understand that putting any maps on your device violates the right of map makers to be paid for their products. This is surprising!
Then why did you write this?

Originally Posted by Giomen

I want to decide myself which maps have to put on my device locked or unlocked. It is quite democratic choice

Was it just some unrelated stuff about democracy which you needed to troll the american citizen?

Originally Posted by Giomen

I think Alizée Jacotey, Jessica Alba, and Scarlett Johanson also have the right to choose!? So Obama do not put to shame of your case ........
.......Accordingly Obama and I consider this last method for removing GirlLock as undemocratic.

@kunix
I think he was referring to this (i hope):

Originally Posted by Neil

...... However the code could be instantly decrypted by waving a 'no limit' Amex card in view of the 'locked unit'. .....

If not... the Cold War has never ended!

Originally Posted by kunix

Oh, so you actually understand that putting any maps on your device violates the right of map makers to be paid for their products. This is surprising!

Was it just some unrelated stuff about democracy which you needed to troll the american citizen?

The first, see smile!
The second, you touched on the first problem of SW and related product market. I do not have much experience in this area as opposed to gender relations Nevertheless I believe that the map makers is also a choice. For example:
- to improve protection and (or) include loss to production costs (more common in underdeveloped countries),
- to improve support and purchase condition for legal user (more common in developed countries),
- it has not been canceled to bringing to justice for right violation at the end (anywhere).
The third, real democracy is the difference in the violation of the rights and property of public and legal entities and the violation of the rights private entities. Do I need to discover - what is why is not good steal from the people? A priori the usual person completely covers the full cost of his things. In the case of legal persons are nuances always - who is who regarding theft