Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Threaded View

  1. #7
    Member +
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    away
    Posts
    35
    Rep Power
    54

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dannym1 View Post
    Has TOPO Swiss the same fate than TOPO Austria, and the file size and quality become lower from version to version?!
    Acually file size should increase with every new version because there is more Information and better quality.
    I have made a comparison between Topo Swiss v.3 and v.4

    Filesize
    v.3 : 367 MB
    v.4 : 373 MB + 22,5 MB SQL

    My impression: v.4 is slightly more detailed, but not actual. In known by me areas there is shown the situation of 2012 year, no more actual roads and buildings newer than 2012.

    The v.3 shows more topo content in the border areas on french, german and austrian territory.

    Filesize:
    v.3 Raster : 3,21 GB
    v.4 Raster : 2,44 GB

    My impression: v.4 shows the same area and content like v.3, BUT in a MUCH lower resolution, as mentioned by sergio2 already.
    This in a BIG step backwards, so I will use RASTER v.3 together with VECTOR v.4.

    You may ask, WHY Garmin did this "update"?

    I will answer, as caty usually answers in similar situations: "Garmin is Garmin!"
    Last edited by hard69; 28th July 2014 at 02:07 PM.

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •