Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Master TOPO Sweden Svealand v3 / Friluftskartan Pro v3 - Svealand jensb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Age
    58
    Posts
    67
    Rep Power
    189

    Default For those of you who prefer torrents

    All four areas in one unlocked img

    Gotalandv3
    MellerstaSodraNorrlandv3
    NorraNorrlandv3
    Svealandv3

    Spoiler: click
    Code:
    Please Login or Register to see the links
    ↓↓↓ Don't post thanking posts. Use the "Like this post" link below instead.

    And if you download a torrent I have posted, please keep seeding, as I´m only seeding a few days until it´s well seeded

  2.    Advertissements


  3. #2
    Vip Master TOPO Sweden Svealand v3 / Friluftskartan Pro v3 - Svealand
    TOPO Sweden Svealand v3 / Friluftskartan Pro v3 - SvealandTOPO Sweden Svealand v3 / Friluftskartan Pro v3 - Svealand
    Smulan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Who knows?
    Posts
    135
    Rep Power
    127

    Default Strange error in map

    A very strange error can be found in the FriluftskartanProv3 Svealand (and also MellerstaSödraNorrlandv3 since the area with the error is covered by both maps). The reading of height is wrong in a limited area of the map. See attached pictures from Mapsource.
    On the east side of this valley the readings are correct and on the west side it is far too low, less than one third of the correct.
    (And no, I have not "Photoshoped" the screen dumps )

    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ][Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

    I also managed to find a place where both correct and incorrect values are showed:

    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

    The coordinares for this place are N61.99084 E12.87473 for those interested in trying to repeat this

    The v2 of the same map does not have the same problem as far as I can see.
    I have not digged any deeper in this, but interesting questions are why does the argument for the elevation vector have a faulty value and even a double value?
    And I have no idea if this is a common problem or if it is only in this area that it exists, and it would normally not be a problem in the nature. You would certainly know if you are at 300m or 900m, since the trees only grows up to around 850m in this area.

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •