Autoguia Brazil up to 3.32
This post requires you to click the "LIKE this post" button and hit F5 to read this content.
Autoguia Brazil 3.32
191 MB IMG
Unlocked
Mirrors![]()
This post requires you to click the "LIKE this post" button and hit F5 to read this content.
Autoguia Brazil up to 3.32
This post requires you to click the "LIKE this post" button and hit F5 to read this content.
Last edited by hacsat; 17th May 2014 at 02:36 PM.
Which one is the original locked and untouched image?
Brazil-Autoguiagps-v3.32-2014-L.img from pietu:
AUTOGUIA 3.32 UNTOUCHED.img from Pungente:Code:Please Login or Register to see the links
(other fields are the same)Code:Please Login or Register to see the links
I would bet it is the one from Pungente, which has earlier cdate. Or both are modified.
Last edited by omarmotta; 17th May 2014 at 10:18 PM.
@omarmotta; I prefer use the term `untouched` because are cases which the uploader change the log just to erase personal data without unlock the map, not my case...
I believe this is the case of Pietu.
It`s an very interesting question; but I need to ask you what program you use, before I can repeat your comparison and reach some conclusion.
Best regards!
Updating: I don`t found personal data in any of the versions shared, but except mine all havewhat make me conclude that were a earlier version that were changed by server (correct some error?).Header: 16.05.2014 16:24:29
Last edited by Pungente; 18th May 2014 at 12:23 PM.
Recommended to use [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] to unpack my files.
Zero posters won`t have hide links available, please post a [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] to be able to like and unhide links.
↙ LIKE to show your gratitude and unhide links; refresh (hit F5) if necessary.
I had problem with the last download.
Can you give more details? Difficult to help with only this information.
What size of the file you got and if it have the same size of the file you was downloading; from what link you downloaded, the model of your device, using SD Card or not, GMapTool Info and/or Details,...; any clue you give will help us to help you!
Best regards! I hope you get your trouble solved, if you not found yet a solution.
Recommended to use [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] to unpack my files.
Zero posters won`t have hide links available, please post a [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] to be able to like and unhide links.
↙ LIKE to show your gratitude and unhide links; refresh (hit F5) if necessary.
I simply used gimginfo to compare the images.
I don't know the process you guys use to get these maps and share; is it gotten from official server already in the IMG format? or do you need to merge parts with the mapsource program? in last case, it would change the cdate, right?
@ omarmotta; There were a very first 3.32 version released, with the Header to 14/05; maybe some error, or new and improved data made him change the map in server, which came with new Header to 16/05. That were the cause of the disparity well observed by you. I don`t have any problem in discover it, downloading all versions available here and comparing logs with GMapTool.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] give much more data then you posted and make very much easier to compare.
I cannot say that`s my fault because the only thing I done is to be vigilant and download the map near the moment it were available, later they changed it... Now you can find in my post both versions to download; of course, use the newer Header, always.
This map is only available in SD Card version, no PC Installer.
Thanks for the feedback and your kind answer! Mystery solved!
Last edited by Pungente; 20th May 2014 at 12:09 PM. Reason: add info
Recommended to use [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] to unpack my files.
Zero posters won`t have hide links available, please post a [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] to be able to like and unhide links.
↙ LIKE to show your gratitude and unhide links; refresh (hit F5) if necessary.
I can see the only difference GMapTool show is the header and the "Mapset" name given.
Probably the header date was updated when pietu give a nice name to the "Mapset".
'length' is the same, and all sub-files details are the same.
Also, doing a binary comparison of both files, they are the same except for some strings of the headers ("Autoguiagps v3.32 2014 ALL" x "1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,").
As happens with any compiled code, if it was recompiled much more things would change.
Therefore, there is nothing new, fixed or changed.
Code:Please Login or Register to see the linksCode:Please Login or Register to see the links
Bookmarks