FAQ The notification for the average speed camera does not work.
I found the following file on a friendly site, it created a solution for notifying sections of average speed, alas, it does not work because there is no connection to the map, all points have 270 degrees for opening a section and 70 for closing at a speed of 5 km/h
Spoiler: +++
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
FAQ The fact that the speedcam.txt file cannot be used in the form of advertising, with the exception of using a comma after DIRECTION, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
As a result, not a big test with the base laradiobbs. First test, speedcam.txt records do not contain any records other than iGO:
Car movement 1-2 turn 3-4, Based on the direction of the cameras, they should only trigger at points 1 and 2
17:35 - 1, 17:38 - 3, 17:39 - 3, 17:43 - 4, Photos 1 and 2 show warnings, 3 and 4 do not.
Spoiler: Test 1
Second test, original files from the database laradiobbs.
- Point 4 did not work because it is too far away, but it shows that it works in a circular notification.
Last edited by Andrey Form; 7th February 2024 at 06:43 PM.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
FAQ creation of a new type for iGO cameras, when this has been implemented for a long time, errors in the notification strategy.
An attempt to create a new type of camera aimed in one direction.
Its characteristics are recording violations in two directions of movement, but within the camera’s coverage area, and the detection range of the violator is 500 meters. When using the pongo skin with the ability to notify that the camera has the ability to measure your speed after crossing. But since we have an alert in two directions, one direction remains false, as shown in the figure.
8.055361,44.811310,1,70,2,334
The only way to notify these types of cameras is only using VB encoding:
Last edited by Andrey Form; 21st February 2024 at 10:59 AM.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Have you heard anything about azimuth direction in iGO? Usually the azimuth is directed in the direction of travel, and not in reverse.
The POI Base Italian Speedcam file is full of these "errors" and it is you who publish them.
X,Y,TYPE,SPEED,DIRTYPE,DIRECTION, // 11.12.2023 iGO POIBase code 1,2,3,4,5 Mod AF
14.686252,36.725552,1,30,1,16
14.686252,36.725552,1,30,1,187
14.686166,36.733428,1,30,1,161
14.686166,36.733428,1,30,1,345
15.092574,36.869775,1,40,1,126
15.092574,36.869775,1,40,1,304
This is clearly intentional, instead of using Dirtype 2 the coordinates are repeated but with the opposite direction.
what notifications will the driver receive as a result if he uses these 2 types at the same time.
Just do some tests....... but do it seriously and completely.
Make a txt file with 3-4 positions with opposite directions and only use this file in the speedcam folder.
Then delete the previous file and use another txt file with the same 3-4 locations but this time with Dirtype = 2.
I await your developments, I already know the problems and their solutions......
@BIRBANTE
Hi,
The fact is that I do not modify the POI base, I only publish data from it. So you see what the base does, of course it is better to have one point and 2 directions than 2 points and 2 directions, there is no need to carry out tests, the only question is the number of lines in the speedcam.txt file, this does not affect anything else.
Last edited by Andrey Form; 10th March 2024 at 02:29 PM.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
But in fact I didn't blame you for those files, I just pointed out that you publish them and "you should" know how they are made, I noticed it because I compared them with those of SCDB.
I urged you to take tests, but you won't take them and I'll tell you what happens anyway.
In the first test with "double" files, the first station encountered is regularly alerted, the following ones are ignored. On the way back the same thing happens, the first station we encounter is alerted and the subsequent ones are ignored.
In the second test using the stations with Dirtype 2 exactly what happens in the first test happens, both on the outward and return journey.
It seems that both modes are "toxic" for iGO, however, if we use the usual txt files in the speedcam folder in addition to the "toxic" one, everything magically works normally, probably diluted with many other "normal" stations they are no longer so "poisonous".
Just do some tests....... but do it seriously and completely...
If you know how notification of alarm points in iGO works, then you don’t need to do any tests with the program, just look at the contents of speedcam.txt. Any options work, since they have the same type of alert, in this case it is radar.
Last edited by Andrey Form; 10th March 2024 at 03:28 PM.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Any options work, since they have the same type of alert, in this case it is radar.
Even in the tests the Type is always the same, but the fact remains that if they are not "diluted" they are toxic and iGO would not alert them, including those with Dirtype = 2.
It will not warn you only in one case, if the angle of deviation from the direction of the road is more than 19 degrees - this is azimuth. And yes, there can be a lot of such points in Italy, this is when the radars are located on the bends of the roads. But this has nothing to do with the direction of the alert.
There is a simple solution for those who use radar databases where the points have a directional effect, this is an entry in sys:
Last edited by Andrey Form; 10th March 2024 at 03:53 PM.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Bookmarks