"Second maneuver with alternating distance" UX

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by userninenine [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Ok, small Update only for LUNA

---

Spoiler: WELL DONE!

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Thank you

userninenine and kwbs.
I think that we lost the main idea....
About this ux
whick is made only for Luna....
Etc!!!!!
Gives distance and time for the second diricon!!!!!
Also give time for the first diricon.

All the others about, whick is smart
OR
Where can we put the distance...
IS OUT OF THE PHILOSPOHY
of this zip!

I think it's far away from your philosophy
So it's better to delete it from your suggestions

Spoiler: image

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by frontzosd [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Where can we put the distance... IS OUT OF THE PHILOSPOHY of this zip!

---

Dear @frontzosd
Your UX is excellent and there is no question about its philosophy. But, what about a user who wants only the distance given in the second maneuver, without "time" and that it would look good and aesthetic too?

This is the reason...
I say that this ux, is not for this thread.
I create full skin, and full ux dear friend.
I don't made half things....
When I navigate, I need infos
I don't care about aesthetic!!

And the important!!!
ux's are for all!!

Sorry

Dear and honorable @frontzosd
I think you already know me a little bit. I am looking for solutions without a full skin shell and there are other users like me.
In cases where you are considering creating UX regardless of skin, you are greatly appreciated and blessed!
You can see the amount of likes you get and realize that there are users, that this is exactly what they are looking for, but they usually do not initiate such inquiries, as I do.
The conceptual subject of this Thread is "Second maneuver with alternating distance UX". Why is it sort of sin for a skinless user's philosophy?
Are users/forum members obligated to win a creative UX only on a full skin basis?
I wanted to ask you something else somewhere else, but now I'm hesitating to do so.

OK dear friends..

Lets do it, like this

Edit

For the first 4 users...
Download again, and replace the ux please

Spoiler: photos

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

:)

As you created in [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Quote:

---

1. Simple Press over Second Diricon change the diricons Frame icons, from factory to Glass.
2. And simple press over first diricon icon, many times Gives the transparency we like!!

---

Now and here:
2. Ok
1. Not working

EDIT
@frontzosd
Still, Pressing over Second Diricon - i don't get the "GLASS" frame.

Spoiler: The "GLASS" frame

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

I though that this operation was not important!

Yes @frontzosd, it is important. It's part of a much-needed and requested aesthetic ;)

Thank You Very Much!

Spoiler: WELL DONE!

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Hi @frontzosd

Sorry to trouble you again.

I've done a full darkness transparency test and found in the Portrait display that, most of the area of the second maneuver is hidden UNDER the first maneuver area.

Spoiler: Landscaspe is OK

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Spoiler: Portrait is NOT OK

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

To enjoy full and perfect use, we would love to be repaired :)