Thread: iGO Speedcam (DISCUSSION)

Better - of course it will work correctly, lately I see how they use "salad" placing in folder content/speedcam everything that they managed to download from the Internet, while forgetting what types their navigator configuration supports. [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

For example, the assembly based on the Pongo skin, as everyone knows, with coding VB.

The assembly is intended for use with a cargo vehicle called the iGO Pongo® Truck, list of files to use:

Code:

Please Login or Register to see the links

here is the salad, SpeedCamEU Truck.txt already has all the files above the list (39, 40, 44, 38, 41, 42, 53) all the speeds for the Truck. Next is a regular file
SpeedCamText.txt Base SCDB where is the speed limit for passenger cars.

FAQ Speed ​​camera notification not working V2

There are such stories, I recently wrote how important it is
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] But this was not the limit of stupidity.

Apparently this is a new development.
in general DIRTYPE cannot be 30 (40,50,60), but only 1, 2 or 0
And of course in most cases, if (DIRECTION) = 0 then (DIRTYPE) should be = 0


X,Y,TYPE,SPEED,DIRTYPE,DIRECTION
-0.646830,51.926690,1,,30,0
-5.887360,54.520810,4,,50,0
-5.873060,54.595610,1,,30,0
-5.352670,50.208970,1,,60,0
-5.045080,50.416940,4,,30,0

Spoiler: +

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

The file was downloaded from a friendly forum

Do not use this file, you can download it as a sample, what you do not need to put in the content/speedcam folder:

This is probably important for all users to know, for all those who will use a fake file.
Moreover, not all the lines are false, but only 15%. I think this is not the case, swap places.
X,Y,TYPE,DIRECTION,SPEED,DIRTYPE
This rearrangement will make 85% of the alert lines the same incorrect, without notification.

Code:

Please Login or Register to see the links

What people expect is mutual help on radars files and explanations of how they work.

Of course, they won't use it, but there are two ways to find out about it by reading a note on the forum and the second option is to get a fine if you use a false file. The LoLo forum prefers the second option. And it's their choice, they don't control the fake files.

Just such reports, when we consider possible variants of fake files on the forum and give users the overall picture, and the main thesis, not all speedcam.txt files.You can put txt in the navigator.

Originally Posted by Andrey Form

The LoLo forum prefers the second option. And it's their choice, they don't control the fake files.

It's just that they got tired of the hype and your aggression over there. the role of msieurlolo forum isn't to decide saying who's wrong or who's right, you think that Cerrobi does not do the job well, it is your conviction but not necessarily theirs, the question is not to choose a base according to the risk of obtaining a fine with bad data, but to preserve the freedom of this choice by the diversity of offers and not only of a single depositary.