I made the tests below with TT maps/fsp 2017.06 and unav hsp 2017.05 in Rome/Italy using a route with start point at the Colosseum :) and destination in Ciampino Airport (outside city). Route "now" is Thursday about 22:30 (few online traffic), and route "scheduled" is on Friday at 18:00 (many people living out of Rome leave the city that time). Also I just put screenshot of "fast alternatives"
So even if the route is not that long, the differences are obvious, and it seems that fsp has more data (more delay is calculated), and when using both fsp and hsp the "weights" of traffic are somehow added. Quite cool... :)
6th October 2017, 05:12 PM
osiris4isis
Yes, .fsp has "more data" because it covers by minutes vs .hsp covering by hours.
Update: UX (tested for NextGen9.18.27.687519-Gift(26Jan2017), NextGen9.18.27.693527-World(14Mar2017) and NextGen9.18.27.689739-Basarsoft(10Feb2017)) at [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]