Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.
Page 10 of 44 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 436
  1. #91
    Important User Patched firmwares for JNX files
    Patched firmwares for JNX filesPatched firmwares for JNX filesPatched firmwares for JNX filesPatched firmwares for JNX filesPatched firmwares for JNX filesPatched firmwares for JNX filesPatched firmwares for JNX files
    catymag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    light side
    Posts
    15,508
    Rep Power
    5042

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by youssev View Post
    Hi,
    I know, thats an old stuff, but is there a JNX patch working for a Colorado 300 ?

    You can read from the link given in post one:

    Code:
    Please Login or Register to see the links
    This format is supported by the following Garmin devices: Astro 320, Colorado 300/400, Dakota 10/20, Edge 800, Etrex 20/30, GPSMAP 62/78, Montana 600/650, Oregon 200/300/400/450/550, Rino 610/650/655.

    Firmware versions supported by the patcher
    Colorado 300/400 3.50, 3.60, 3.70
    Code:
    Please Login or Register to see the links
    l9ebnsm
    You have to navigate to get to the good.

    Galaxy S5 Kitkat 4.4.2 / Nuvi1200->1250 / Nuvi3790T->34xx / Nuvi 2200 / Nuvi 66 / Oregon 600

  2.    Advertissements


  3. #92
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    14
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Without changing number and over 2.20 it went smoothly as well. Now Edge 800 is running 2.40 with jnx support.

    Quote Originally Posted by AlexWhiter View Post
    I see.

    Could you please try to upgrade now to 2.40 without changing the version number in the patcher?

  4. #93
    AlexWhiter
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1ilya View Post
    Without changing number and over 2.20 it went smoothly as well. Now Edge 800 is running 2.40 with jnx support.
    I'll check the version changing functionality.
    Thanks for reporting this bug!

  5. #94
    Navigation software Moderator kunix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Belarus
    Posts
    908
    Rep Power
    438

    Default

    @AlexWhiter
    Are you talking about changing firmware version or some other version?

  6. #95
    AlexWhiter
    Guest

    Default

    @kunix
    I was talking about changing the FW version.
    Starting from version 2.9, the patcher can adjust the firmware version by the specified value (the same feature as in RGN Tools).
    But it seems that there's something wrong with this adjustment.

    I've checked the patcher, however, I could not find anything abnormal both in the code, and in the results it produces.

  7. #96
    Navigation software Moderator kunix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Belarus
    Posts
    908
    Rep Power
    438

    Default

    How do you find the FW version?
    As for me, at first I determine FW's base address (exact method depends on firmware type, most frequently I substract offset of 5A A5 from 2nd dword of FW), and then I use the fact that 3rd and 4th dwords point to HWID and SWVER respectively.

  8. #97
    AlexWhiter
    Guest

    Default

    In fw_all.bin, my code does the same as you've described.
    But to change the FW version does not only mean to change it in fw_all.bin, but also in all other subfiles in GCD container.
    So it's necessary to enumerate them all and to change their headers in GCD.

  9. #98
    Navigation software Moderator kunix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Belarus
    Posts
    908
    Rep Power
    438

    Default

    ok, I understand now.
    UPD
    Did you think about patching the number that's used as RSA module? I think it's going to have very stable signatures
    Last edited by kunix; 24th October 2011 at 09:39 PM.

  10. #99
    AlexWhiter
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kunix View Post
    Did you think about patching the number that's used as RSA module? I think it's going to have very stable signatures
    I'm not sure I understand what you are talking about

  11. #100
    Navigation software Moderator kunix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Belarus
    Posts
    908
    Rep Power
    438

    Default

    I've read at your site that JNX files are locked with asymmetric encryption. I suppose that RSA is used because Garmin have already used RSA in GMA protection. If you replace RSA module number (which is the biggest part of public key), you can create RSA signatures by your own.

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •