Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    20
    Rep Power
    0

    NUVI Garmin Oregon 450 VS Montana 600. Max memory SD card.

    I planing to buy Garmin Oregon 450 or Montana 600. Use for cycling and walking in the forest. I think Montana 600 maybe will be to big for this purpose? What do you think?

    How big memory SD Micro card can i use in Garmin Oregon 450 and Montana 600. (4,8,16,32?)

  2.    Advertissements


  3. #2
    ☼ADMIN☼
    catymag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    light side
    Posts
    23,555
    Rep Power
    5307

    Default

    Take a look:
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    You have to navigate to get to the good.
    Nuvi1250/Nuvi 34xx/Nuvi 2200/Nuvi 66/Oregon 600/Galaxy S5 MM 6.0.1/TomTom GO/iGO Nextgen Avic,Basar,Isr.Gift/Navigon
    Please don't flood my pm box with questions you can post on forum!! You won't hear back from me.

  4. #3
    Navigation software expert

    Giomen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Suomi-Russia
    Age
    49
    Posts
    2,578
    Rep Power
    589

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arve28 View Post
    I think Montana 600 maybe will be to big for this purpose?
    People say - Big woman is more kindly.
    In our case the biggest device is most faster. The same SD size but different speed of rendering.
    Love your wife? Buy yourself a GPS for answering to her favorite question: "Dear, where are you?".

  5. #4
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Sofia
    Age
    31
    Posts
    919
    Rep Power
    213

    Default

    Montana is cool. Have a lot of functions compared to other garmin handhelds. But it is big and...not very cheap. If it is only for cycling and walking I would prefer Dakota or the new etrex 20/30 as they are compact.

  6. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Australia
    Age
    56
    Posts
    8
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I have a Montana 600 and love it. It is so much better and faster than the GPSMAP 60CSX I had previously.
    The Montana has a nice big screen. If you can live with the bigger size then you cannot go wrong with the Montana.

  7. #6
    Master dirtbikermp3's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fichtelmountains.de
    Posts
    100
    Rep Power
    59

    Default

    All devices expect Oregon and Montana have only a display with about 35.000 pixels - thats for topo maps with a lot of information not enough.
    GPS-Devices: serveral Garmin, Samsung Galaxy, Audi MMI

  8. #7
    Navigation software expert Kanopus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Internet
    Posts
    481
    Rep Power
    249

    Default

    Mostly because map browsing is not a primary function of outdoor devices. And even Montana at this task is very inferior to a sheet of paper map.
    Thanks, Kanopus

  9. #8
    Master sergio2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Spain
    Age
    49
    Posts
    345
    Rep Power
    125

    Default

    Hi,

    If you use a good raster map in addition to garmin vector map on your Montana, you do not really need to have a paper map cause the screen is large enough to display large areas : it is so pleasant not to have to open a paper map when it's windy and just have a look on your Montana screen !
    However, keep a paper map in your backpack in the case where your Montana gets out of order.

  10. #9
    Navigation software expert Kanopus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Internet
    Posts
    481
    Rep Power
    249

    Default

    I can't see any reason to use raster map, when vector maps give vastly more functionality, better visibility, take less space and work faster.
    For sure big screen is a good feature, but size and weight of Montana is out of proportion. And even Garmin wasn't able to put there a speaker.
    Thanks, Kanopus

  11. #10
    Master sergio2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Spain
    Age
    49
    Posts
    345
    Rep Power
    125

    Default

    Sorry, but french raster maps are far more detailed than garmin Topo France V2 (May be in other countries are Garmin vector maps better than raster maps but not in France). For example, rock bars are only displayed on french raster maps.
    As far as Montana weight and size are concerned, it is not a real problem.

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.